content a0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a8 a9
Start / Slutförvar / Technical Note

Technical Note

Cover of Technical NoteUnder the Act on Nuclear Activities, the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM) reviews SKB’s applications concerning a repository for spent nuclear fuel and an encapsulation facility. As part of this review work, SSM commissions consultants to obtain information and provide expert opinions on specific issues. SSM’s Technical Note series reports on these consultants’ assignments.

Strålsäkerhetsmyndigheten (SSM) granskar Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB:s (SKB) ansökningar enligt lagen (1984:3) om kärnteknisk verksamhet om uppförande, innehav och drift av ett slutförvar för använt kärnbränsle och av en inkapslingsanläggning. Som en del i granskningen ger SSM konsulter uppdrag för att inhämta information och göra expertbedömningar i avgränsade frågor. I SSM:s Technical Note-serie rapporteras resultaten från dessa konsultuppdrag.

 Number  Title Author
 2016:33 Översikt över mättekniker för verifiering av atypiska bränsleobjekt på Clab Sophie Grape
 2016:23 Modelling of the thermal evolution of the KBS-3 repository at Forsmark and associated induced seismic activity Jeoung Seok Yoon, Ove Stephansson, Ki-Bok Min
 2016:16 Possible influence from stray currents from high voltage DC power transmission on copper canisters Fredrik Lundmark, Mattias Hermansson, Jacob Edvinsson
 2016:05 Assessment of SKB TR-14-15 Assessment of SKB TR-14-15 “Possible influence from stray currents from high voltage DC power transmission on copper canisters” Laust B Pedersen
 2016:02 An updated review of the creep ductility of copper including the effect of phosphorus Kjell Pettersson
 2015:52 Review of SKB’s creep model, its implementation into ABAQUS and an evaluation of SKB’s analyses of theevaluation of SKB’s analyses of the copper canister Peter Segle
 2015:51  Initial State of Spent Nuclear Fuel Sophie Grape, Carl Hellesen, Henrik Sjöstrand, Mattias Lantz, Staffan Jacobsson Svärd
 2015:49 Independent Modelling of Engineered Barrier Evolution and Coupled THMC: Canister Corrosion Calculations in SR-Site Steve J. Benbow, Richard Metcalfe, Jenny Burrow
 2015:48 Supplementary review of SKB’s further RFI response Richard Kłos, Anders Wörman
 2015:45 Parallel assessment of effects on non-human biota using RESRAD-BIOTA Karolina Stark
2015:41 Hydrogeological aspects of future human actions for a repository at Forsmark Joel E. Geier
2015:40 Assessment of flow-related transport parameters used in the SR-Site safety case Joel E. Geier
2015:39 Granskning av KBS-3 avseende nukleär kriticitetssäkerhet  Dennis Mennerdahl
2015:30 Rock Mechanics - Assessing the likelihood and extent of fracture growth in the KBS-3 repository at Forsmark Tobias Backers, Tobias Meier, Peter Gipper, Ove Stephansson
2015:29 Quality Assurance in SKB’s Copper Corrosion Experiments Tim W. Hicks
2015:22 Further modelling and sensitivity study using the GEMA-Site “alternative biosphere models” and review of material from SKB’s RFI response Ryk Kłos
2015:08 Rheological properties of the Bentonite Buffer – Main Review Phase Göran Sällfors
2015:06 Feasibility of Backfilling Deposition Tunnels– Main Review Phase David G Bennett
2015:05 Review of uncertainty propagation and sensitivity analysis in SR-Sit Klaus-Jürgen Röhlig
 2015:01 Rock Mechanics - Thermal properties and thermal modelling of the rock in a repository of spent nuclear fuel at Forsmark – Main Review Phase Ove Stephansson and Peter Gipper
2014:59 Relation between earthquake magnitude, fracture length and fracture shear displacement in the KBS-3 repository at Forsmark – Main Review Phase Jeoung Seok Yoon, Ove Stephansson and Ki-Bok Min
2014:58 Rock Mechanics - Assessing probability and extent of blind faults and fault-end growth around the KBS-3 repository at Forsmark – Main Review Phase Tobias Backers, Tobias Meier, Peter Gipper and Ove Stephansson
2014:57 Issues in the Corrosion of Copper in a Swedish High Level Nuclear Waste Repository: Phase III.  Role of Sulphide Ion in Anodic and Cathodic Processes Digby D. Macdonald, Samin Sharifi-Asl and G.R. Engelhardt
 2014:55 Further Reproduction of SKB’s Calculation Cases and Independent Calculations of Additional “What If?” Cases James Penfold
2014:54 Further Modelling Comparison of Simple Reference Biosphere Models with the LDF Modelling Approach – Main Review Phase Russell Walke and Laura Limer
 2014:50 A Study of Availability of Fuel Data for Sweden’s Spent Nuclear Fuel Henrik Lindahl
 2014:48 Independent assessment of groundwater sulphide content in the long-term Adrian Bath
 2014:47 Assessment of groundwater salinity evolution at repository depth and especially the impact of dilute water infiltration Adrian Bath
2014:46 QA in SKB’s Groundwater Flow Model Timothy W. Hicks
2014:44 Independent evaluation of the number of critical canister positions in the KBS-3 repository at Forsmark – Main Review Phase Joel Geier
 2014:43 Workshop on general corrosion of copper – Main Review Phase Michael Apted
 2014:41 Review of Radionuclide Abstraction and Selection in the SKB Safety Case– Main Review Phase Roland Benke and Sitakanta Mohanty
 2014:40 Review of Performance Confirmation Programs and Potential Roles in SSM’s Current Review of SKB’s License Application – Main Review Phase Mick Apted
 2014:39 “Wormhole” and Multiple Loss of Buffer Safety Function Scenarios Zhou, M. J. Apted, and R. Arthur
 2014:38 Detailed assessment of radionuclide Kd-values for the geosphere F. Paul Bertetti
 2014:35 Modelling comparison of alternative biosphere models with LDF models and evaluation of selected parameter values used in the biosphere dose assessment - Main review phas Richard Kłos, Laura Limer, George Shaw and Anders Wörman
 2014:34 Modelling Comparison of Simple Reference Biosphere Models with LDF Models - Main Review Phase Russell Walke
 2014:33 Reproduction of SKB’s Canister Failure Calculations - What-If and ‘Residual’ Scenario to Illustrate Barrier Functions Sitakanta Mohanty and Osvaldo Pensado
 2014:32 Assessment of the derivation and use of distribution coefficients (Kd) and concentration ratios (CR) – Main Review Phase Nicholas Beresford, Patrick Boyer and Brenda Howard
 2014:29 Independent Modelling of Radionuclide Transport, Evaluation of Colloid Transport Modelling – Main Review Phase Osvaldo Pensado, Sitakanta Mohanty and Budhi Sagar
 2014:24 Workshop on biosphere issues  – Main Review Phase Roger D. Wilmot
 2014:23 Workshop on Rock Mechanics Issues and their Implications for Groundwater Flow. – Main Review Phase Ove Stephansson and Neil Chapman
 2014:22 Workshop on seismic hazard at Forsmark
– Main Review Phase
Neil Chapman , Ove Stephansson, Flavio Lanaro and Lena Sonnerfelt
2014:17 Assessment of radiological effects on non-human biota – Main Review Phase Brenda Howard och Nicholas Beresford
2014:11 Radionuclide Solubility Limits in SKB’s Safety Case David G Bennett
2014:10 Rock Mechanics - Confidence of SKB’s models for predicting the occurrence of spalling – Main Review Phase Tobias Backers, Tobias Meier, Peter Gipper och Ove Stephansson
2014:08 Review of Long-Term Redox Evolution of Groundwater and Potential Influence of Oxygenated Glacial Meltwater in SR-Site Jude McMurry och F. Paul Bertetti
2014:07 Review of the geological mapping and geophysical measurement techniques for the determination of critical properties around deposition holes -Main Review Phase Erik Eberhardt och Mark Diederichs
2014:05 Assessment of flows to deposition holes – Main Review Phase Joel Geier
2013:37 Rock Mechanics – Evolution of fracture transmissivity within different scenarios in SR-Site – Main Review Phase Ki-Bok Min, Jaewon Lee och Ove Stephansson
2013:36 Review and assessment of aspects of the Qeq concept – Main Review Phase Stuart Stothoff och Chandrika Manepally
2013:35 Rock Mechanics – Confidence of SKB’s models for predicting the occurrence of a damage zone around the excavations – Main Review Phase Goodluck I. Ofoegbu och Kevin J. Smart
2013:34 Seismology – Post-glacial seismicity and paleoseismology at Forsmark James McCalpin
2013:33 Seismology – Frequencies and mechanisms. -Initial review phase Hilmar Bungum och Conrad Lindholm 
2013:16 Assessment of PWR fuel depletion and of neutron multiplication factors for intact PWR fuel copper canisters – main review phase Dennis Mennerdahl
2012:67 Hydrogeological modelling of the Forsmark site Joel E. Geier
2012:65 Review of the Nuclear Criticality Safety of SKB’s Licensing Application for a Spent Nuclear Fuel Repository in Sweden Dennis Mennerdahl
2012:63 Review of Radionuclide Sorption on Bentonite and Forsmark Bedrock Material Matthew Randall
2012:62 Review of the MARFA Code Peter Robinson
2012:60 Handling of climate related issues in the safety assessment SR-Site Per Holmlund
2012:59 Initial review phase – Dose Assessment Methodology Ryk Kłos, Laura Limer, George Shaw och Anders Wörman
2012:58 Independent radionuclide transport modelling – Reproducing results for main scenarios Osvaldo Pensado och Sitakanta Mohanty
2012:57 Shear movement of near-field rock due to large earthquakes Goodluck I. Ofoegbu och Kevin J. Smart
2012:56 Biosphere Dose Assessment: Review of Dose Consequence of Radionuclides in the Uranium-238 Series Decay Chain SSM
2012:55 Review of SKB’s Radionuclide Transport Methodology Richard Little, Philip Maul, Peter Robinson och Claire Watson
2012:54 Initial Review Phase for SKB´s safety assessment SR-Site: Geological structures and deformation zones, from site investigation to safety assessment Sven A. Tirén
2012:53 Review of Engineering Geology and Rock Engineering aspects of the operation and closure of a KBS-3 repository at the Forsmark site – Initial Review Phase David Saiang
2012:52 Shear movement of near-field rock due to large earthquakes Tobias Backers och Ove Stephansson 
2012:51 Rock Mechanics related to long-term repository and site evolution Ki-Bok Min och Ove Stephansson
2012:48 Use of Solubility Limits in the SR-Site Safety Assessment SSM
2012:46 Review of Landscape Models used in SR-Site Michael Egan, Richard Little och Russell Walke
2012:44 Review of Matrix Diffusion and related properties of intact rock in SKB’s Licence Application for a Spent Nuclear Fuel Repository in Forsmark, Sweden Roy Haggerty
2012:43 Literature review of groundwater flow in permafrost Stuart Stothoff
2012:42 Initial review of physical properties and processes of the buffer and backfill – Installation and initial state David G. Bennett
2012:41 Hydrogeological conditions at the Forsmark site Joel E. Geier
2012:39 Review of Engineering Geology and Rock Engineering aspects of the construction of a KBS-3 repository at the Forsmark site – Initial Review Phase Erik Eberhardt och Mark Diederichs
2012:38 Radiological effects on non-human biota - initial review Karolina Strark
2012:37 Selective review of the hydrogeological aspects of SR-Site John H. Black
2012:36 Documentation and Traceability of Data in SKB’s Safety Assessment SR-Site: Initial Review Phase T.D. Baldwin och T.W. Hicks
2012:35 Review of SKB’s Code Documentation and QA for the SR-Site Safety Assessment Robert D. Brient och Thomas R. Trbovich
2012:34 Review of FEP Handling in the SR-Site Safety Assessment: Initial Review Phase T.W. Hicks och T.D. Baldwin
2012:33 Review of Groundwater Chemistry in SKB’s Safety Assessment SR-Site Jude McMurry och F. Paul Bertetti
2012:32 Groundwater Chemistry in SKB’s Safety Assessment SR-Site: Initial Review Adrian Bath
2012:30 Initial review of physical properties and processes of the buffer and backfill. THM and other physical processes Göran Sällfors
2012:29 Initial review of chemical and erosional processes within the buffer and backfill – Geochemical processes Mick Apted och Randy Arthur

2012:28

Initial review of chemical and erosional processes within the buffer and backfill – Geochemical processes David Savage
2012:26 Initial review of chemical and erosional processes within the buffer and backfill - Chemical erosion processes Randy Arthur
2012:24 Initial Review of SR-Site Main Report David G. Bennet
2012:21 Initial Review Phase for SKBs Safety Assessment SR-Site: Corrosion of Copper J.R. Scully och T.W. Hicks
2012:18 SR-Site Independent Modelling of Engineered Barrier Evolution and Coupled THMC: Contribution to the Initial Review Phase Steven Benbow, Richard Metcalfe, Claire Watson och Alex Bond
2012:17 Corrosion of copper canister Peter Szakálos och Seshadri Seetharaman
2012:15 A review of the mechanical integrity of the canister Peter Segle
2012:13 A review of the creep ductility of copper for nuclear waste canister application Kjell Pettersson
2012:10 Technical Note, Review of the Geomicrobiological Aspects of SKB’s Licence Application for a Spent Nuclear Fuel Repository in Forsmark, Sweden R John Parkes

 

 

 

 

 


Senast uppdaterad/granskad 2016-12-16